The question relating to the possession of Blinds.com by The House Depot is a typical one for customers within the dwelling enchancment sector. Many patrons search to grasp the company construction behind these retailers when making buying choices for window coverings. Analyzing the father or mother corporations or affiliated entities can present insights into pricing methods, return insurance policies, and total customer support approaches.
Understanding the connection between main retailers and their subsidiaries or acquired corporations is essential for customers. This data helps in evaluating product choices, assessing model repute, and doubtlessly figuring out alternatives for value matching or leveraging loyalty packages throughout totally different entities. Traditionally, massive companies have usually acquired smaller, specialised companies to develop their market attain and product portfolios.
The next sections will discover the possession construction of Blinds.com, detailing whether or not or not it’s a subsidiary of The House Depot. This can embody inspecting the publicly out there info relating to company acquisitions and partnerships to supply a definitive reply to this incessantly requested query. Moreover, it should define different sources for comparable services.
1. Company Construction
Understanding the company construction is key to figuring out whether or not The House Depot owns Blinds.com. The organizational framework dictates strains of authority, reporting constructions, and possession stakes. Analyzing this construction clarifies the character of any affiliation between the 2 entities.
-
Hierarchy of Possession
The hierarchy of possession defines the relationships between father or mother corporations and subsidiaries. If The House Depot is the last word father or mother firm of Blinds.com, it workouts direct management over Blinds.com’s operations. Investigating regulatory filings and company disclosures can reveal this hierarchical construction, illustrating the chain of command and possession percentages. Any shared executives or board members can be indicative of a parent-subsidiary relationship.
-
Subsidiary Relationships
Subsidiary relationships contain one firm (the father or mother) proudly owning a controlling curiosity in one other firm (the subsidiary). This management permits the father or mother to affect the subsidiary’s strategic choices and monetary efficiency. If Blinds.com operates as a subsidiary of The House Depot, it’s topic to The House Depot’s overarching insurance policies and monetary oversight. This relationship can be explicitly acknowledged in monetary experiences and company bulletins.
-
Authorized Entity Standing
The authorized entity standing of every firm offers perception into their autonomy and operational independence. If Blinds.com is a separate authorized entity from The House Depot, it possesses its personal belongings, liabilities, and contractual obligations. Nonetheless, whilst a separate entity, Blinds.com may nonetheless be owned by The House Depot. A radical evaluate of authorized paperwork, resembling articles of incorporation and possession agreements, clarifies the unbiased standing and any possession ties.
-
Monetary Reporting Construction
The monetary reporting construction reveals how every firm’s monetary efficiency is consolidated or reported individually. If Blinds.com’s monetary outcomes are consolidated into The House Depot’s monetary statements, this means a major degree of management and possession. Analyzing the footnotes in The House Depot’s annual experiences can disclose any subsidiary relationships and the extent of economic integration between the 2 corporations.
By analyzing these aspects of company construction, a clearer image emerges relating to the independence or interconnectedness of The House Depot and Blinds.com. The presence or absence of a parent-subsidiary relationship, evident in possession hierarchy, authorized standing, and monetary reporting, will definitively tackle the query of possession and the extent of The House Depot’s management over Blinds.com.
2. Mother or father Firm
The inquiry of whether or not The House Depot owns Blinds.com necessitates a direct investigation into the father or mother firm of Blinds.com. Understanding the father or mother firm is paramount as a result of it determines the last word management and strategic course of Blinds.com. If The House Depot serves because the father or mother, it could inherently affect Blinds.com’s operational insurance policies, monetary choices, and advertising methods. For instance, a father or mother firm usually dictates pricing methods, provide chain administration, and customer support protocols inside its subsidiaries. The sensible significance lies in recognizing potential synergies or conflicts in enterprise practices ensuing from shared company governance.
Conversely, if Blinds.com operates underneath a special father or mother firm, it could point out a separate strategic course, aggressive positioning, and potential operational autonomy. An actual-world instance entails inspecting company filings with the Securities and Alternate Fee (SEC) to discern possession constructions. Publicly traded corporations should disclose important possession relationships, offering verifiable proof of parent-subsidiary connections. Understanding the father or mother firm permits customers to deduce potential pricing benefits or disadvantages based mostly on the father or mother’s market affect and provide chain relationships.
In conclusion, figuring out the father or mother firm of Blinds.com is essential for assessing The House Depot’s direct or oblique affect. The sensible software extends to evaluating potential conflicts of curiosity, understanding aggressive dynamics, and informing buying choices. Addressing the first query entails an intensive examination of company constructions and possession disclosures to determine the diploma of management exercised by any father or mother firm, notably The House Depot, over Blinds.com.
3. Subsidiary Standing
The subsidiary standing of Blinds.com is an important aspect in figuring out whether or not The House Depot owns the corporate. A subsidiary is outlined as an organization during which one other firm (the father or mother) owns a controlling curiosity, often greater than 50% of the shares. If Blinds.com operates as a subsidiary of The House Depot, The House Depot successfully controls its operations, strategic choices, and monetary insurance policies. Figuring out this standing is important for understanding the connection between the 2 entities.
-
Direct Possession
Direct possession happens when The House Depot immediately holds a majority of Blinds.com’s shares. This establishes an unambiguous parent-subsidiary relationship. Publicly out there info, resembling SEC filings or company disclosures, would clearly point out such possession. If The House Depot is listed as the bulk shareholder, Blinds.com operates underneath its direct management. This association influences Blinds.com’s product sourcing, pricing methods, and alignment with The House Depot’s total enterprise goals.
-
Oblique Possession
Oblique possession entails The House Depot proudly owning a controlling curiosity in one other firm that, in flip, owns Blinds.com. This creates a layered construction of possession. For example, The House Depot would possibly personal a holding firm that possesses the bulk shares of Blinds.com. Tracing this oblique possession requires an in depth evaluation of company hierarchies. Whereas much less instantly obvious, oblique possession nonetheless confers management and affect over Blinds.com’s strategic course.
-
Operational Integration
Even with out direct or oblique majority possession, important operational integration may recommend a powerful affiliation akin to subsidiary standing. Operational integration contains shared administration groups, built-in provide chains, or mixed advertising efforts. For instance, if Blinds.com’s merchandise are completely offered by means of The House Depot’s retail channels or if its customer support operations are built-in, it factors to an in depth operational relationship which will resemble subsidiary standing. Nonetheless, operational integration alone doesn’t definitively set up possession; it merely signifies a strategic alliance.
-
Monetary Consolidation
Monetary consolidation is a key indicator of subsidiary standing. If Blinds.com’s monetary outcomes are consolidated into The House Depot’s monetary statements, it strongly means that The House Depot has a controlling curiosity. This consolidation displays The House Depot’s skill to manage Blinds.com’s monetary insurance policies and efficiency. Analyzing The House Depot’s annual experiences and monetary disclosures is important to find out if such consolidation happens, thereby clarifying Blinds.com’s subsidiary standing.
In abstract, figuring out Blinds.com’s subsidiary standing entails inspecting direct and oblique possession, operational integration, and monetary consolidation. Every of those components offers perception into the diploma of management The House Depot exerts over Blinds.com. By analyzing these parts, one can set up whether or not Blinds.com operates as a subsidiary of The House Depot or as an unbiased entity.
4. Acquisition Historical past
The acquisition historical past of Blinds.com is immediately related to figuring out whether or not The House Depot possesses possession. Company acquisitions are definitive occasions that switch possession and management from one entity to a different. If The House Depot acquired Blinds.com at any level up to now, this acquisition would signify a transparent indicator of current possession. The absence of an acquisition report, conversely, means that The House Depot doesn’t at the moment personal the corporate by means of direct buy. For instance, if The House Depot had publicly introduced and accomplished the acquisition of Blinds.com, regulatory filings and press releases would verify the transaction, detailing the phrases, possession switch, and strategic rationale behind the acquisition. Understanding this historical past is virtually important as a result of it offers verifiable proof of possession modifications, influencing shopper notion and strategic positioning of each corporations.
Analyzing the acquisition historical past entails scrutinizing public data, monetary experiences, and trade information for any bulletins associated to mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures involving Blinds.com and The House Depot. Typically, these transactions are topic to regulatory evaluate, necessitating disclosure of key particulars. For example, the Securities and Alternate Fee (SEC) requires publicly traded corporations to report materials acquisitions, providing a dependable supply of knowledge. Moreover, monetary information retailers and enterprise databases observe company transactions, offering complete timelines of firm possession modifications. These sources usually reveal intricate particulars, such because the acquisition value, efficient date, and integration plans, that are essential for assessing the affect of the acquisition on the businesses’ operations and market place.
In abstract, the acquisition historical past serves as a vital lens by means of which to evaluate the possession query. Whether or not The House Depot owns Blinds.com hinges on whether or not a documented acquisition occasion occurred. Investigating public data, monetary disclosures, and trade information offers a factual foundation for figuring out possession, enabling knowledgeable shopper choices and strategic analyses. The absence of an acquisition report implies that The House Depot doesn’t personal Blinds.com by means of direct acquisition, prompting a broader investigation into different potential relationships or affiliations.
5. Authorized Possession
Authorized possession constitutes the definitive foundation for figuring out if The House Depot owns Blinds.com. This encompasses the documented rights and titles to the corporate’s belongings and operational management. Authorized possession is just not merely a matter of affiliation; it’s a verifiable situation established by means of legally binding contracts, inventory possession, and regulatory filings. The House Depot’s possession, or lack thereof, is evidenced by official paperwork that stipulate the entity possessing the fitting to manage Blinds.com’s enterprise actions and belongings. For instance, if The House Depot’s identify seems on the inventory certificates representing a controlling share of Blinds.com, or if regulatory filings with the Securities and Alternate Fee (SEC) point out a merger or acquisition that transferred possession, then authorized possession by The House Depot is established. This possession confers the fitting to nominate Blinds.com’s board of administrators, set its strategic course, and consolidate its monetary outcomes into The House Depot’s monetary statements. The sensible significance lies in understanding who in the end bears the duty for Blinds.com’s operations, monetary efficiency, and compliance with authorized rules.
The significance of authorized possession as a part of the query of whether or not The House Depot owns Blinds.com can’t be overstated. It’s the basic determinant upon which all different components, resembling operational integration or advertising partnerships, are secondary. Authorized possession establishes the parameters of management and authority, no matter day-to-day collaborative actions. An illustrative state of affairs entails a strategic alliance the place The House Depot and Blinds.com have interaction in joint promotional campaigns or share distribution networks. Whereas such collaboration could recommend an in depth relationship, it doesn’t, in itself, signify possession. Solely a authorized switch of possession, documented by means of formal agreements and regulatory filings, definitively establishes The House Depot’s management. Furthermore, sensible implications prolong to issues of legal responsibility; authorized possession dictates which entity bears the monetary and authorized tasks for Blinds.com’s actions and obligations.
In abstract, authorized possession offers the unambiguous reply to the query of The House Depot’s possession of Blinds.com. This dedication hinges on verifiable documentation, resembling inventory possession data and regulatory filings, which delineate the entity holding the fitting to manage Blinds.com’s belongings and operations. Whereas collaborative preparations and operational integrations could exist, they don’t supersede the primacy of authorized possession because the defining issue. The absence of documented authorized possession implies that, regardless of any collaborative endeavors, The House Depot doesn’t personal Blinds.com, with the tasks and rights remaining vested in one other entity. This understanding clarifies the strains of authority, monetary accountability, and strategic course throughout the aggressive panorama of dwelling enchancment and window coverings.
6. Monetary Ties
Monetary ties function a vital indicator in figuring out the connection between The House Depot and Blinds.com, and consequently, whether or not possession exists. These ties prolong past easy transactions to embody funding relationships, shared debt obligations, and consolidated monetary reporting. The presence of serious monetary interdependence suggests a deeper connection, doubtlessly indicative of possession or management. For example, if The House Depot offers substantial loans to Blinds.com or ensures its debt, this creates a monetary dependency that warrants additional investigation. The consolidation of economic statements, whereby Blinds.com’s revenues and bills are integrated into The House Depot’s experiences, would strongly indicate a parent-subsidiary relationship. Discerning these monetary connections requires an intensive evaluate of each corporations’ monetary disclosures and regulatory filings, resembling these submitted to the Securities and Alternate Fee (SEC).
Analyzing the movement of funds between the 2 entities is essential. This contains inspecting funding transactions the place The House Depot could have acquired a major fairness stake in Blinds.com. Furthermore, scrutiny needs to be utilized to any shared monetary providers agreements, resembling centralized treasury capabilities or danger administration practices. Shared banking relationships or interlocking directorates with monetary oversight tasks can also signify monetary alignment. A sensible instance would contain assessing whether or not The House Depot receives dividends or different types of monetary distributions from Blinds.com, which might immediately hyperlink the monetary efficiency of Blinds.com to The House Depot’s backside line. Understanding these monetary interdependencies helps to determine the diploma of management or affect that The House Depot exerts over Blinds.com’s monetary operations.
In abstract, the existence and nature of economic ties between The House Depot and Blinds.com are pivotal in figuring out possession. Substantial monetary dependencies, resembling debt ensures, fairness investments, or consolidated monetary reporting, recommend an in depth relationship indicative of management. Disclosing these monetary connections offers customers and buyers with a clearer understanding of the company construction and potential strategic alignment between the 2 corporations. The evaluation of those monetary hyperlinks, together with different components resembling authorized possession and operational integration, contributes to a complete analysis of whether or not The House Depot owns Blinds.com.
7. Model Affiliation
Model affiliation serves as an indicator, albeit not a definitive one, of potential possession or management between The House Depot and Blinds.com. The diploma to which the 2 manufacturers affiliate themselves in advertising campaigns, product choices, or shared buyer experiences can recommend a deeper relationship. For example, if Blinds.com merchandise are prominently featured and marketed inside The House Depot shops or on its web site, this degree of name integration may indicate a strategic alliance or perhaps a parent-subsidiary relationship. Nonetheless, such affiliations may also come up from purely business agreements, with none possession ties. A related instance entails co-branded promotions the place each entities provide reductions or incentives to clients who buy merchandise from each retailers. The energy and consistency of those co-branded initiatives can sign the extent of their collaborative relationship. The sensible significance lies in understanding that model affiliation, whereas suggestive, doesn’t conclusively show possession; authorized and monetary documentation offers the last word verification.
Conversely, a scarcity of overt model affiliation could point out that The House Depot doesn’t personal Blinds.com. If the 2 manufacturers function independently, with separate advertising methods, product strains, and customer support channels, it means that they’re distinct entities. An actual-world state of affairs would possibly contain Blinds.com providing merchandise that immediately compete with these offered by The House Depot, or the absence of cross-promotional actions designed to drive visitors between the 2 retailers. Even within the absence of direct competitors, the absence of any seen model alignment means that the 2 corporations keep operational and strategic autonomy. Evaluating the character and extent of any co-branding efforts is essential in discerning whether or not the affiliation is solely business or indicative of a extra important relationship.
In abstract, model affiliation offers a contextual clue, however not a conclusive reply, to the query of The House Depot’s possession of Blinds.com. Whereas sturdy model integration can recommend an in depth strategic alliance or perhaps a parent-subsidiary relationship, it doesn’t supersede the necessity for verification by means of authorized and monetary documentation. Conversely, the absence of any model affiliation means that the 2 corporations function independently. The important thing problem lies in distinguishing between advertising collaborations and proof of real possession. Finally, model affiliation have to be thought of along side different components, resembling authorized possession, monetary ties, and acquisition historical past, to type a complete evaluation of the connection between The House Depot and Blinds.com.
8. Aggressive Panorama
The aggressive panorama is intrinsically linked to the question “does dwelling depot personal blinds.com.” Understanding the aggressive dynamics throughout the window coverings market offers context for potential motivations behind an acquisition or sustained independence of Blinds.com. The existence of a extremely aggressive market influences strategic choices relating to market share, pricing, and product differentiation. This evaluation is essential for evaluating the positioning of each entities, no matter possession.
-
Market Share and Focus
The distribution of market share amongst key gamers immediately impacts the aggressive depth. If The House Depot and Blinds.com function as separate entities inside a concentrated market, their strategic choices can be influenced by the necessity to keep or develop their respective market shares. Conversely, if The House Depot owns Blinds.com, a consolidated market strategy is likely to be adopted, doubtlessly altering pricing methods and product choices to maximise total profitability. The extent of market focus informs the ability dynamics between opponents, influencing funding choices and promotional actions.
-
Pricing Methods and Differentiation
Pricing methods and product differentiation ways are main means by which corporations compete. Unbiased entities like The House Depot and Blinds.com would probably make use of distinct pricing fashions and product portfolios to draw totally different buyer segments. Nonetheless, if possession is consolidated, pricing and differentiation methods is likely to be harmonized to keep away from inner competitors and optimize income throughout the broader enterprise. For example, a unified entity may provide premium merchandise by means of one channel and extra value-oriented choices by means of one other, thereby capturing a wider vary of buyer preferences.
-
Obstacles to Entry
Obstacles to entry, resembling excessive capital necessities, established model loyalty, or regulatory hurdles, form the aggressive surroundings. Excessive boundaries to entry can defend present gamers from new competitors, doubtlessly influencing the strategic significance of buying present market contributors like Blinds.com. If The House Depot faces important obstacles in increasing its presence within the on-line window coverings market organically, buying Blinds.com may present a sooner and extra environment friendly technique of entry. Understanding these boundaries offers perception into potential acquisition motivations.
-
Aggressive Rivalry
The depth of aggressive rivalry amongst present companies impacts market dynamics. In a extremely aggressive market, corporations incessantly have interaction in aggressive pricing, advertising campaigns, and product innovation. If The House Depot and Blinds.com are unbiased opponents, their rivalry would contribute to this dynamic. Nonetheless, consolidated possession may scale back aggressive strain and doubtlessly result in extra secure pricing or decreased advertising expenditure. Evaluating the aggressive depth and strategic interactions between these entities informs the understanding of their total market positioning.
In conclusion, the aggressive panorama evaluation offers an important framework for evaluating the strategic implications of The House Depots potential possession of Blinds.com. The market share dynamics, pricing methods, boundaries to entry, and aggressive rivalry all contribute to the understanding of the market pressures and strategic choices out there to each entities. Whether or not they function as unbiased opponents or underneath consolidated possession, the aggressive panorama shapes their strategic choices and total market efficiency.
9. Market Positioning
Market positioning, within the context of whether or not The House Depot owns Blinds.com, is a vital aspect for strategic evaluation. Market positioning refers back to the course of of building the picture or id of a model or product so that customers understand it in a sure means. The possession construction immediately influences how these manufacturers place themselves relative to one another and to different opponents throughout the window coverings market. For example, if The House Depot doesn’t personal Blinds.com, every firm maintains distinct market positions, concentrating on doubtlessly totally different buyer segments with various pricing methods and product choices. This unbiased positioning permits every entity to maximise its attain and enchantment to particular shopper wants. Conversely, if The House Depot owns Blinds.com, the market positions could also be strategically aligned to keep away from direct competitors throughout the father or mother firm’s portfolio, optimizing total market protection and profitability.
A key cause-and-effect relationship exists between the possession construction and the ensuing market positioning methods. An unbiased Blinds.com would probably concentrate on its on-line presence and specialised product choices, doubtlessly emphasizing customized options and a broader choice in comparison with The House Depot’s extra standardized choices in bodily retail areas. In distinction, if The House Depot owns Blinds.com, the net model could complement the brick-and-mortar shops, offering an prolonged aisle for merchandise not available in-store or providing specialised providers resembling digital consultations. For instance, contemplate Sherwin-Williams’ acquisition of Valspar. Publish-acquisition, Sherwin-Williams strategically positioned Valspar merchandise to cater to totally different market segments, optimizing the general portfolio and minimizing inner competitors. This strategic alignment highlights the sensible significance of understanding the possession construction and its affect on market positioning.
The sensible significance of understanding the market positioning of each entities lies within the skill to discern strategic alignment, or the shortage thereof, which offers insights into their aggressive intentions. Discerning whether or not their methods are independently pushed or strategically aligned helps to grasp whether or not The House Depot owns Blinds.com. Even with out specific affirmation of possession, analyzing advertising supplies, product choices, and pricing methods can provide clues concerning the nature of their relationship. If The House Depot owns Blinds.com, challenges in sustaining distinct model identities and avoiding channel battle have to be addressed by means of cautious market positioning methods. In abstract, analyzing market positioning offers useful insights into the possession and strategic intentions, thereby enhancing the understanding of the aggressive panorama.
Often Requested Questions Concerning The House Depot and Blinds.com
The next part addresses widespread inquiries regarding the potential possession relationship between The House Depot and Blinds.com. These questions purpose to make clear the company construction and market dynamics surrounding these two entities.
Query 1: Is there a proper announcement from The House Depot relating to the acquisition of Blinds.com?
Official bulletins associated to mergers and acquisitions are usually disseminated by means of press releases, regulatory filings with the Securities and Alternate Fee (SEC), and investor relations communications. A search of those sources will verify or deny any acquisition announcement.
Query 2: Do The House Depot and Blinds.com share govt management or board members?
Shared management, resembling overlapping govt groups or board members, can point out an in depth relationship or potential possession. Analyzing company governance constructions and management profiles of each corporations can present perception into any shared personnel.
Query 3: Are Blinds.com merchandise completely offered by means of The House Depot’s retail channels?
Unique distribution agreements can recommend a strategic alliance or parent-subsidiary relationship. If Blinds.com merchandise are solely out there by means of The House Depot’s shops or web site, it indicators a powerful degree of integration between the 2 corporations.
Query 4: Is Blinds.com’s monetary efficiency consolidated inside The House Depot’s monetary statements?
Monetary consolidation is a major indicator of possession. If The House Depot contains Blinds.com’s revenues and bills in its consolidated monetary experiences, it suggests a controlling curiosity and a parent-subsidiary relationship.
Query 5: Do The House Depot and Blinds.com have interaction in co-branded advertising campaigns or promotions?
Co-branded advertising campaigns can point out a strategic alliance, however not essentially possession. Analyzing the frequency and nature of those campaigns can present insights into the diploma of collaboration and model alignment between the 2 corporations.
Query 6: How does the pricing of comparable merchandise examine between The House Depot and Blinds.com?
Important pricing variations for comparable merchandise can recommend unbiased market positioning. If the pricing methods are aligned, it would point out a coordinated effort, notably underneath widespread possession.
The solutions to those questions present a basis for understanding the connection between The House Depot and Blinds.com. These indicators contribute to a complete evaluation of whether or not The House Depot owns Blinds.com.
The following part will discover different sources for buying blinds and window coverings, providing customers further choices for his or her dwelling enchancment wants.
Evaluating Company Possession and Its Implications
Figuring out if The House Depot owns Blinds.com necessitates a structured strategy. The next ideas provide steering on easy methods to assess company possession and perceive its potential penalties.
Tip 1: Scrutinize Official SEC Filings: Publicly traded corporations should disclose important possession relationships. Reviewing filings with the Securities and Alternate Fee offers verifiable proof of parent-subsidiary connections.
Tip 2: Analyze Company Construction Charts: These organizational charts element the hierarchy of possession, figuring out father or mother corporations and their subsidiaries. Look at these charts for specific hyperlinks between The House Depot and Blinds.com.
Tip 3: Examine Monetary Reporting Practices: Search for consolidated monetary statements, indicating a parent-subsidiary relationship. Examine whether or not Blinds.com’s monetary outcomes are integrated into The House Depot’s annual experiences.
Tip 4: Assess Model Integration Methods: Look at the extent to which The House Depot and Blinds.com co-brand advertising campaigns, share product strains, or combine customer support channels. Whereas not definitive, sturdy model integration can recommend a deeper relationship.
Tip 5: Overview Acquisition Historical past Databases: Analysis respected databases resembling Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) databases to determine if The House Depot has acquired Blinds.com at any level.
Tip 6: Analyze Government Management Profiles: Examine whether or not there’s overlap between the manager management groups or board members of The House Depot and Blinds.com. Shared management can point out nearer ties.
Tip 7: Evaluate Pricing Methods: Analyze pricing for comparable merchandise between the 2 entities. If there are excessive similarities it may be an essential issue to be thought of
The following pointers facilitate a complete evaluation of company possession, enabling knowledgeable judgments about potential implications for competitors, pricing, and strategic alignment.
The next part offers different buying sources to think about.
Possession Dedication
The previous evaluation has explored varied aspects related to figuring out whether or not The House Depot owns Blinds.com. This exploration encompassed examinations of company construction, father or mother firm identification, subsidiary standing, acquisition historical past, authorized possession, monetary ties, model affiliation, aggressive panorama, and market positioning. Every of those parts offers contributing proof to the general evaluation.
Primarily based on publicly out there info and established enterprise evaluation rules, definitive conclusions relating to possession necessitate verification by means of official sources resembling SEC filings, company statements, and authorized documentation. These sources present the last word affirmation or denial of a parent-subsidiary relationship. Due to this fact, customers and trade observers ought to seek the advice of these main sources to acquire essentially the most correct and present evaluation of the possession standing between The House Depot and Blinds.com.
